US military strikes Iran as Trump mulls attacks on bridges

# Why This Matters The escalating military strikes against Iran represent a dangerous shift from targeted tactical operations toward broader infrastructure warfare, with potentially severe consequences for global energy security and international stability. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 21 percent of the world's petroleum passes daily, has become the explicit focus of these operations—meaning any successful disruption could trigger immediate oil price spikes that ripple through every economy dependent on affordable energy. If the Trump administration follows through on considering attacks against Iranian bridges and other civilian infrastructure beyond military targets, it would mark a significant departure from post-World War II norms governing armed conflict and could justify Iranian retaliation against American interests or allies throughout the Middle East. The combination of actual strikes and public discussion of expanded targets creates acute risk of miscalculation: Iran may feel compelled to respond to demonstrate strength, while the U.S. may interpret that response as justification for further escalation, potentially spiraling into a broader regional conflict that neither side intended.